Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hager v. Dill
as 0:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Franklin H. Hager
Defendant:
Gordon J. Dill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dill v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv00616
Plaintiff:
Michael Dill
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dill v. San Roman et al
as 5:2019cv00034
Defendant:
Carlos Rodolfo San Roman and KNM Transport, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Dill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jennifer Mason, et al v. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam,, et al
as 16-2313
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JENNIFER MASON, CARL ROGERS, II, TERESA SPRINGER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LOCKWOOD, ANDREWS & NEWNAM, P.C., a Michigan corporation and LOCKWOOD, ANDREWS NEWNAM, INC., a Texas corporation
Defendant:
LEO A. DALY COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation
Mason et al v. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv10663
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Mason , Carl Rogers, II , Teresa Springer and others
Defendant:
Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C. , Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. and Leo A. Daly Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dilling v. DePuy Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20301
Plaintiff:
Barbara T. Dilling
Defendant:
DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dill v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22473
Plaintiff:
Catherine M. Dill
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dilling v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2007oe40609
Plaintiff:
Kristin Dilling
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical Inc and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
