Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Guzman v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65116
Plaintiff:
Daniel Guzman
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Guzman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Roman Guzman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
James Adams and Nancy Guzman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Guzman et al v. Pierre et al
as 3:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Carlos Guzman and Guerdy Vanegas
Defendant:
Nandy Pierre and FedEx Freight Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
DA v. The TJX Companies, Inc.
as 5:2023cv10288
Plaintiff:
DA and Deisy Guzman
Defendant:
The TJX Companies, Inc. Doing business as Marshalls and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Guzman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Nancy Guzman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moeggenberg v. Baez et al
as 1:2022cv12553
Plaintiff:
Keith Moeggenberg
Defendant:
Juana Baez and Chastity Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Guzman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02996
Plaintiff:
Sunilda Guzman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rosa et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03002
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rosa and Carmen Guzman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Guzman v. C.R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02510
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Guzman
Defendant:
C.R Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
