Cases 1 - 10 of 351
Howard v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65598
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jared B. Howard
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howard v. Angiodynamics, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Howard
Defendant:
Angiodynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Haynes v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01783
Plaintiff:
Howard Haynes
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howard v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01607
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Howard
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sternfeld et al v. Oak Park, City of
as 2:2024cv10846
Plaintiff:
Howard Sternfeld and Joyce Sternfeld
Defendant:
City of Oak Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Howard v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00872
Plaintiff:
Cothe Howard
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wright v. City of Akron et al.
as 5:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Michelle S. Wright
Defendant:
City of Akron, Magistrate Mary Ann Mendlick, Leah Sewell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Handy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Howard Handy
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reed v. Mikanadze et al.
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Daniel Howard Reed
Defendant:
Giorgi Mikanadze and Asap Gio Corporation
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
St. Thomas v. PJ&A et al.
as 4:2023cv02344
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Howard St. Thomas
Defendant:
PJ&A and Jeffrey Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
