Cases 1 - 10 of 2,536
Coleman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03150
Plaintiff:
Brenda J Coleman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Roland v. Booth et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Susan Roland
Defendant:
Savannah J Booth, Allison Brinkhaus and William Booth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Stapleton v. Parlulo et al
as 1:2024cv11420
Plaintiff:
John J. Stapleton
Defendant:
Dominic Parlulo and Thomas Parlulo
Pettaway et al. v. Osmialowski et al.
as 3:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
Stephanie S. Pettaway, Ora Pettaway and Ora Pettaway, III
Defendant:
Edward J. Osmialowski, American Red Cross, American Red Cross of Greater Columbus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brauchle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02892
Plaintiff:
Laurie J Brauchle
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
O'Connell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02813
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. O'Connell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dimitar Petlechkov v. Michael Stengel
as 24-5483
Plaintiff:
DIMITAR PETLECHKOV
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. STENGEL, dba Stengel Law Firm, P.C.
Francisco et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02633
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Francisco and Lauren Francisco
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Herrin v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02640
Plaintiff:
Paula J. Herrin
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sisson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Sisson and David J. Perez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
