Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03076
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Bay & Bay Transfer Co., Inc.
as 5:2022cv00668
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Bay & Bay Transfer Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00846
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Davidson County and Judge John Aaron Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith Jr. v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03430
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Smith Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davidson et al v. Snyder et al
as 5:2019cv12675
Plaintiff:
T. T.1, Tammy Woofenden, Charles L. Banks and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Gerald Ambrose, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03305
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2018cv11770
Plaintiff:
Darlene Cox , Mary Cox , Michael Cross and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D. SNYDER , City of Flint, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv13289
Plaintiff:
Cyrstal Anderson , T. G. , M. L. and others
Defendant:
Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C., Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc., Leo A. Daly Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2017dp20007
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
