Cases 1 - 10 of 4,951
Radel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02689
Plaintiff:
John Radel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Casey v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02727
Plaintiff:
John Casey
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wine v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02717
Plaintiff:
John Wine
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCurdy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02457
Plaintiff:
John B McCurdy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02373
Plaintiff:
John Lee Carter
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Presley v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02396
Plaintiff:
John B Presley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woods v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2024cv02304
Not Yet Classified:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Steve Woods
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. doing business as The Home Depot and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Payne v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02331
Plaintiff:
John B. Payne, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Senior et al v. PAM Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Lerlaine J. Senior, A.C. and Ai.C.
Defendant:
PAM Transport, Inc. and John W. Heavener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv Removal- Motor Vehicle
Giragos v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02321
Plaintiff:
John G. Giragos, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
