Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ronald Emrit v. Kara Pratt, et al
as 23-5309
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY KARA PRATT, of Hillsboro, Texas, TEXAS BAR, TEXAS SUPREME COURT, Supreme Court of Texas Supreme Court Building and others
Ronald Emrit v. Kara Pratt, et al
as 23-5310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY KARA PRATT, of Hillsboro, Texas, TEXAS BAR, TEXAS SUPREME COURT, Supreme Court of Texas Supreme Court Building and others
Emrit v. Attorney Kara Pratt of Hillsboro, Texas et al
as 5:2023cv00088
Defendant:
Board of Disciplinary Appeals, Attorney Kara Pratt of Hillsboro, Texas, Texas Bar and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 3:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Texas Supreme Court, Texas Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Antonio Hudson v. Denise Page Hood, et al
as 22-2169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DENISE PAGE HOOD, Chief Judge, United States District Court, ARTHUR J TARNOW, Judge, United States District Court, ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Judge, United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals and others
Antonio Hudson v. Denise Hood, et al
as 17-1455
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DENISE PAGE HOOD, Chief Judge, United States District Court, ARTHUR J. TARNOW, Judge, United States District Court, ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Judge, United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miller v. Supreme Court of Ohio et al
as 2:2011cv00211
Plaintiff:
Selina Miller
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Ohio, Ohio Attorney General Office, Mary Ellen O'Shaughnessy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
