Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Stanley v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 2:2017cv00167
Plaintiff:
Emmalee Stanley
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Ohio Reformatory for Women, Gary C Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 2:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Emmalee Stanley
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Ohio Reformatory for Women, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Portune et al
as 1:2016cv01174
Plaintiff:
Mamie L. Brown
Defendant:
Todd Portune, Moira Wehr, Barbara Maloney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Ohio et al v Bey
as 1:2016cv02177
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio, City of Rocky River, Rocky River Municipal Court and others
Defendant:
Khadijah Nia Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raimey v. Edwards et al
as 2:2016cv00403
Plaintiff:
Nancy L. Raimey
Defendant:
Rose Edwards , Harlis J. Thompson, Jr. , Suseela Nalluri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynum v. The City of Zanesville, Ohio et al
as 2:2015cv02389
Plaintiff:
Loretta Victoria Lynum
Defendant:
The City of Zanesville, Ohio, Bryan Ruff, Cody Love and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nephew v. Burkes et al
as 2:2014cv02088
Plaintiff:
Evan Nephew
Defendant:
Roni Burkes , Phil Elms , Clara Golding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burk v. Bubp et al
as 1:2014cv00835
Plaintiff:
James L. Burk
Defendant:
Danny R. Bubp, William C. Foster, Jayme Eldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Turner et al
as 3:2014cv02042
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jackson
Defendant:
Neil Turner, Sargeant Moore, Mrs. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
