Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
State of Ohio et al v. Pitts et al
as 1:2017cv00385
Petitioner:
Devin Branch , Kelvin Erby and Tracy Udrija-Peters
Respondent:
Christopher Pitts , Earnest Smith , Khadijah Guy and others
3rd_pty_defendant:
Nathaniel Martin and Barbara J. Thomas
3rd_party_plaintiff:
Christopher Pitts , Belinda Kyle , Brandon King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 4:2016cv01222
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Mark Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015oe00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Miller et al v. Meyer et al
as 2:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Miller , James E. Lehman, Jr. , Michele E. Ward-Tackett and others
Defendant:
Randall Meyer , State of Ohio Office of the Inspector General , Office of the Brown County Prosecutor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
