Cases 31 - 40 of 55
EALY et al v. DLOTT et al
as 3:2015cv00169
Plaintiff:
LANCE Q. ELLIS EALY, Larry E Ealy and SCLG-LLC
Defendant:
SUSAN DLOTT, Michael R Barrett, JEREMY ROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Harrison
as 1:2015cv00290
Plaintiff:
Vivian Janet Bowman
Defendant:
Lynessa Ellis Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrington-Bey v. City of Bedford Heights et al
as 1:2014cv02514
Plaintiff:
Anita Arrington-Bey
Defendant:
City of Bedford Heights , Tim Honsaker , Maurice Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beyoglides v. Montgomery County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2014cv00158
Plaintiff:
Harry G Beyoglides, Jr
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff, NaphCare, Inc., Ted Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis et al v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2012cv03089
Plaintiff:
Brandon Ellis and Amber O'Neil
Defendant:
Michael C Williams, City of Akron and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ruffin v. Dawkins et al
as 1:2012cv00572
Plaintiff:
Davonte Ruffin
Defendant:
Henry Dawkins and Justin Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jolivette v. Husted et al
as 2:2012cv00603
Plaintiff:
Greg Jolivette
Defendant:
Jon Husted , Frank Cloud , Tom Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dabish et al v. State of Ohio et al
as 3:2012cv00146
Plaintiff:
Robert Dabish and Dabish Investments Group Inc.
Defendant:
State of Ohio , Mike DeWine , City of Fremont, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graves et al v. Mahoning County et al
as 4:2010cv02821
Plaintiff:
Shannon Graves , Michelle Benner , Amber Sexton and others
Defendant:
Boardman Township, Ohio, Smith Township, Ohio, Goshen Township, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
