Cases 61 - 70 of 95
Cox v. Hoagland et al
as 3:2014cv00637
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenny C. Hoagland, Ramon Pineroa, Michael L. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cambron et al v. RK Shows Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00368
Plaintiff:
Harry S. Cambron and Andrea Wetzel
Defendant:
RK Shows Inc. , City of Hillview, Kentucky , Elliott Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davenport v. Clark
as 6:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Davenport
Defendant:
Freddie Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Crenshaw v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2014cv00307
Plaintiff:
Amanda Crenshaw
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government , Louisville Metro Corrections Department , Mark E. Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hall-Farley v. Logan et al
as 0:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hall-Farley
Defendant:
Cameron Logan, Terry Clark, Ringrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
Oscar Adams and Michael Knights
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky , Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet , Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Smith et al
as 0:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Clark
Defendant:
Matt Smith and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Medley v. Shelby County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Robert Medley
Defendant:
Shelby County, Kentucky, Rob Rothenberger, Bobby Waits and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
