Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Olivier v. McMillian et al
as 3:2017cv01471
Plaintiff:
Jerry Olivier
Defendant:
Kim McMillian, (f/n/u) Ansley, Keith Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olivier v. Hicks et al
as 3:2017cv01300
Plaintiff:
Mardoche Olivier
Defendant:
Clarksville, City of and Leigh Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mardoche Olivier v. Montgomery County Courts, et al
as 17-5665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Defendant - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL, BONDING COMPANY and STATE OF TENNESSEE
Jerry Olivier v. City of Clarksville, et al
as 17-5564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY OLIVIER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, LIEUTENANT B. ADAMS and CHIEF AL ANSLEY
Olivier v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2017cv00836
Plaintiff:
Mardoche Olivier
Defendant:
Montgomery County Courts, Montgomery County Jail, Bonding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mardoche Olivier v. [unknown] Williams, et al
as 17-5281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Defendant - Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] WILLIAMS, Judicial Commissioner and MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TENNESSEE
Mardoche Olivier v. U.S. Government
as 17-5250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. GOVERNMENT
Mardoche Olivier v. Montgomery County, et al
as 17-5246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY and F/N/U CLAIBORNE, Judicial Commissioner
Mardoche Olivier v. J. Salcedo, et al
as 17-5244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Defendant - Appellee:
J. SALCEDO, Clarksville Police Officer, DAVID MOORE, Clarksville Police Officer and CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, TENNESSEE
Mardoche Olivier v. City of Clarksville PoliceDept, et al
as 17-5242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CLARKSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY CHIEF GRAY, DARREN KOSKI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
