Cases 1 - 10 of 187
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Curry v. Federal Government et al
as 1:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Ashley Curry and Ashley Casanova
Defendant:
Federal Government doing business as President Joe Biden, Mike DeWine, Aftab Pureval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Skilwies v. City of Huber Heights, OH, et al
as 24-3407
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SKILWIES
Defendant:
CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS, OH, CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Albert Pickett, Jr., et al v. City of Cleveland, OH
as 24-3395
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PICKETT, JR., KEYONNA JOHNSON, JAROME MONTGOMERY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH
Amicus Curiae:
NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Cook v. David Boss, et al
as 24-3350
Plaintiff:
JOHN COOK
Defendant:
DAVID BOSS, KELLY VASAS, JONATHON ROMANIN and others
Sheetz, Inc. et al v. City of Centerville, OH et al
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Sheetz, Inc., Morse Road Development LLC and Hemmert Far Hills Properties LLC
Defendant:
City of Centerville, OH, City Council of the City of Centerville, OH, Graceworks Lutheran Services d/b/a/ Bethany Lutheran Village and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michelle Rieg, et al v. Village of Seville, OH
as 24-3337
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE RIEG, BRIAN RIEG, SCOTT WANGLER and others
Defendant:
VILLAGE OF SEVILLE, OH
Intervenor:
NEO COMMERCE CENTER LLC
Jeffrey Rasawehr v. Jeff Grey, et al
as 24-3322
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RASAWEHR
Defendant:
SHERIFF JEFF GREY, Mercer County, OH, MERCER COUNTY, OH and DEPUTY SHERIFF CHAD FORTKAMP, Mercer County, OH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
