Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis v. City of Mansfield Division of Police, et al.
as 1:2022cv01000
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Davis
Defendant:
City of Mansfield Division of Police, Jordan Moore and City of Mansfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carr v. City of Mansfield et al
as 1:2022cv00743
Plaintiff:
Trevor Carr
Defendant:
City of Mansfield and Jordan Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jane Doe, et al v. City Of Mansfield, OH, et al
as 22-3052
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE, An Individual Known to All Parties Moving to Proceed Under a Pseudonym and JOHN DOE, An Individual Known to All Parties Moving to Proceed Under a Pseudonym
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF MANSFIELD, OH and DAVID REMY, Individually and in his former official capacity as Human Resources Director for the City of Mansfield, Ohio
Defendant:
FREEMAN NIXON
Laurence's Towing, Inc. v. City of Mansfield, Ohio et al
as 1:2021cv02282
Plaintiff:
Laurence's Towing, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Mansfield, Ohio and Lori A Cope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
