Cases 91 - 100 of 205
Frith v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2015cv02761
Plaintiff:
Ricky Frith
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County, District Attorney General Ofc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mauldin v. USA et al
as 1:2015cv00106
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Mauldin
Respondent:
USA and U.S. Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Huddleston v. 15th Judicial District Attorney Office et al
as 3:2015cv01163
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Huddleston
Defendant:
15th Judicial District Attorney Office, Jason Lawson, Tom P. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearney v. State of Tennessee Governor et al
as 2:2015cv02701
Plaintiff:
Stratton Kearney
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Governor, Attorney General of this State, Tennessee Board of Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Lee et al
as 2:2015cv00278
Petitioner:
Douglas Wayne Young
Respondent:
Randy Lee and The Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kinslow v. Chapman
as 3:2015cv00429
Petitioner:
Battrick D Kinslow
Respondent:
Arvil Chapman and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Huddleston v. 15th Judicial District Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2015cv01017
Plaintiff:
Robert Huddleston
Defendant:
15th Judicial District Attorney's Office, Jason Lawson, Tom P. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. 23rd Judicial District Attorney General Office et al
as 3:2015cv00955
Petitioner:
Carl Prince
Respondent:
23rd Judicial District Attorney General Office and Cheatham County Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ivy v. U.S. Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2015cv02552
Plaintiff:
James E. Ivy
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney's Office and Calvin David Biggers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02482
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
