Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Hugues v. Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 5:2011cv11566
Petitioner:
Kouadid Hugues
Respondent:
Attorney General, Department of Homeland Security, Chippewa County Jail and others
Mbacke v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 2:2010cv14488
Petitioner:
Cheikh Mbacke
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Moore v. Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 5:2009cv11422
Plaintiff:
Forster Moore
Defendant:
Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv10834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv10656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv14576
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv14066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Terrazas Ramirez v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2007cv13973
Petitioner:
Margarito Javier Terrazas Ramirez
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security, Secretary of and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Tunaj et al v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2007cv00712
Petitioner:
Pjeter Tunaj and Mirijana Tunaj
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzalez, United States Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Laski v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2007cv00660
Petitioner:
Tom Laski, Lucija Laski and Unknown Parties
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzalez and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
