Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02272
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Shelby County Sheriff Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02258
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02260
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Rutherford County Detention Center et al
as 3:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Bamula Ross and Bambula Ross
Defendant:
Rutherford County Detention Center and Rudd Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02239
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County City, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fathera v. Rudd Medical Services
as 3:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Fathera
Defendant:
Rudd Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pipkin v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02095
Plaintiff:
Byron Pipkin
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Kirk Fields, Chief Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Rudd, et al
as 2:2023cv02030
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
F/N/U Rudd, F/N/U Porter and F/N/U Buford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
