Cases 21 - 30 of 269
Jones v. Fender
as 1:2023cv01383
Petitioner:
Lee Jones
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meinke et al v. Stammitti et al
as 1:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
Nolan P. Meinke and Jose Romero
Defendant:
Sheriff Philip R. Stammitti, Captain Hammond Jack, Administrator James Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Butler County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
Butler County Jail, Richard K. Jones, Sheriff, Robert Carpenter; 2675 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garnow v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Ryan Garnow
Defendant:
Sergeant Andrew Jones, Sergeant Devon Phillips, Correctional Officer T. McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Stammitti et al
as 1:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Brooks
Defendant:
Sheriff Phil Stammitti, J.A. Gordon, Lt. Crum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Garrett
as 3:2023cv00653
Petitioner:
Lawrence C. Jones
Respondent:
C. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Montgomery County Jail
as 3:2023cv00076
Petitioner:
Thomas J. Jones
Respondent:
Montgomery County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Reimer Law Co.
as 1:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Edward M. Jones
Defendant:
Reimer Law Co. doing business as Reimer Law
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jones v. Shoop
as 2:2023cv00922
Petitioner:
Clarence Jones
Respondent:
Deputy Warden Timothy Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Corvin J. Young
Defendant:
Beverly D. Jones and Michael D. Morin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
