Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. Betty Williams, et al
as 22-5937
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
BETTY WILLIAMS, Revenue Agent and NATHAN BURTON, State Department of Tennessee
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. USA
as 22-5925
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stinson v. Fowlkes, et al
as 2:2022cv02694
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John T. Fowlkes, Jr., Damon Keith Griffin, Nathan Patrick Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2022cv02695
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John P. Yates, Blair, L.T. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2022cv02697
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson and Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John P. Yates, Blair, Lt. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Unknown BOP Medical Staff
as 2:2022cv02618
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown BOP Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stinson v. Cauley et al
as 2:2022cv02611
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
K. Cauley, Asst. Warden Hall, Camp Admin Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stinson v. Williams et al
as 2:2022cv02576
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson
Defendant:
Betty Williams and Nathan Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stinson v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02575
Petitioner:
Mark Stinson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. J. Dorsey
as 22-5750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER J. DORSEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
