Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Yarbro v. Leibach et al
as 1:2017cv01023
Plaintiff:
Marlon Yarbro
Defendant:
Hardin County Sheriff's Department and Jason Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarbro v. Leibach et al
as 3:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Marlon Yarbro
Defendant:
Hardin County Sheriff's Department and Jason Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Augustin et al v. Bradley County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
Abraham A Augustin and Lorrance B Dais
Defendant:
Bradley County, Tennessee, Bradley County Sheriff's Department and Jimmy Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Freeman et al
as 1:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Jewel Sims
Defendant:
Leotis Freeman, Steven Johnson, Mike Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Putnam County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
Brandon Simpson
Defendant:
Putnam County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Sevier County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv00588
Plaintiff:
Justin Stone
Defendant:
Sevier County Sheriff's Department and Quality Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nixon v. Crouch et al
as 3:2016cv02479
Plaintiff:
Josiah Nixon
Defendant:
Ray Crouch and Stewart County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Warren County Sheriff's Department
as 4:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Warren County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McWilliams v. Rayborn et al
as 3:2016cv00419
Plaintiff:
Philip A McWilliams
Defendant:
Andrew Rayborn, Mark Nottage, Wayne Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marable v. Rutherford County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv01127
Plaintiff:
Julius Marable
Defendant:
Rutherford County Sheriff's Department, 16th Judicial Circuit Court, Murfreesboro Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
