Cases 31 - 40 of 111
Billie Chapman, et al v. Tony Parker, et al
as 23-5279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILLIE JOE CHAPMAN and IAN J. CAMERON
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY PARKER, VINCENT VANTELL, Acting Warden, LIEUTENANT JACKSON and others
Bryan Valentin v. Jeff Tanner
as 23-1207
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRYAN VALENTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFF TANNER, Acting Warden
Xavier Becton v. Vance Laughlin
as 23-5110
Petitioner / Appellant:
XAVIER BECTON, aka Abdul Akhir
Respondent / Appellee:
VANCE LAUGHLIN, Acting Warden
Anderson v. Hillton et al
as 2:2023cv02043
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Anderson
Defendant:
Lisa Hillton, Mrs. Candice Whisman, Shawn Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen Atkins v. Russell Savoie, et al
as 23-1046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN ATKINS, aka Allen Aikens
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER RUSSELL SAVOIE, sued in his individual capacity, WARDEN CONNIE HORTON, Warden, sued in her individual capacity, ACTING WARDEN JAMES CORRIGAN, sued in his individual capacity and others
Herbert Baldridge v. Jeff Tanner
as 23-1039
Petitioner / Appellant:
HERBERT DEWEY BALDRIDGE
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFF TANNER, Acting Warden, Gus Harrison Correctional Facility
Michael Thomas v. Adam Douglas
as 22-2121
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
ADAM DOUGLAS, Acting Warden, Saginaw Correctional Facility
Terry Williams v. James Corrigan
as 22-2096
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRY WAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES CORRIGAN, Acting Warden, Chippewa Correctional Facility
Quran Baker v. Gary Miniard
as 22-2048
Petitioner / Appellant:
QURAN BAKER
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD CURLEY, Acting Warden and GARY MINIARD, Warden
Barnett v. Vantell
as 1:2022cv01233
Plaintiff:
Lamar Barnett
Defendant:
Acting Warden Vincent Vantell and (f/n/u) McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
