Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Duke v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2016cv02480
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Duke
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Rutherford County Sheriff Dept., Robert Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. Hommrich et al
as 3:2016cv00799
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Sharieka Frazier
Defendant:
Bonnie Hommrich , Children's Services, Tennessee Department of , Lynn Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damien Sublett v. Randy White, et al
as 16-5178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN SUBLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY WHITE, Warden, DUKE PETTIT, BRUCE VON DWINGELO and others
John Wooden v. Alton Hesson, et al
as 15-6285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN H. WOODEN, aka Jabari Issa Mandela
Defendant - Appellee:
ALTON HESSON, ROBERT HENRY, JR., TOMMY MILLS and others
Darnell Dukes v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr.
as 15-4157
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARNELL DUKES
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Joe Browder, Jr. v. KY State Prison Officials, et al
as 15-5918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, John Does and Jane Does, PHILLIP PARKER, Warden, JOHN DOE NOS. 1-6, President of Correctcare Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Joe Browder, Jr. v. KY State Prison Officials, et al
as 15-5918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, John Does and Jane Does, PHILLIP PARKER, Warden, JOHN DOE, President of Correctcare Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Moffitt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv01115
Plaintiff:
Johnny Moffitt
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moffitt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv01067
Plaintiff:
Johnny Moffitt
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
