Cases 51 - 60 of 197
Novak v. Prison Health Services, Inc et al
as 2:2013cv11065
Plaintiff:
Theodore Novak
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc, Corizon, Miles and others
McQuitty v. Kankani et al
as 2:2013cv10659
Plaintiff:
Aaron McQuitty
Defendant:
Kankani, P Klee, Janet Seets and others
James Crawford, et al v. Prison Health Services, et al
as 13-1097
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. CRAWFORD and AL LEWIS, JR.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS JAMES MORGAN, PHILIP BERRYMAN, CARLOS CRAIG and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, named as Prisoner Health Services, R. PANDYA, SYED M. SOHAIL and others
Kensu v. Buskirk et al
as 2:2013cv10279
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Defendant:
Joshua B Buskirk , Jeffrey C Stieve, Panjak Malik and others
Baker v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv10230
Plaintiff:
Robert Baker
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Prison Health Services, Incorporated and others
Lowe v. Prison Health Service et al
as 1:2013cv10058
Plaintiff:
Donald Lowe
Defendant:
Prison Health Service, Edelman and Susan McCauley
Gresham v. Romanowsky et al
as 2:2012cv15489
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham
Defendant:
Kenneth Romanowsky, Dan Heyns, Darrel M Stewart and others
Baker v. Stevenson et al
as 2:2012cv15290
Defendant:
Vernon Roy Stevenson, Prison Health Services, Inc, Corizon, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Eddie Wagle v. MDOC, et al
as 12-2526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE WAGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA CARUSO, PATRICIA BARNHART and others
Samuel Coleman v. Robert Naples, et al
as 12-2427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL LEON COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT NAPLES, Warden, JEFFREY C. STIEVE, MD, Chief Medical Officer,, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES INC., a foreign profit corporation, and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
