Cases 1 - 10 of 12,921
England v. Lovette et al
as 6:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. England
Defendant:
Warden Lovette and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Smith v. Commonwealth of KY
as 1:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Lamar R. Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth of KY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith et al v. Dennis et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Lamar R. Smith and Karen Pointer
Defendant:
Jeb Dennis, Jason Dfeil, Brandi Duvall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bixler v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Kagan Cole Bixler
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and David Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beraut v. Mazza et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Genesson Beraut
Defendant:
Kevin Mazza, Brian Owens, Lane Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. McKenzie et al
as 0:2024cv00059
Defendant:
Unknown Fannin, Shaun McKenzie, Ricky Bear and others
Plaintiff:
Brett Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. USA
as 6:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Patrick Baker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Tigue v. Fugate et al
as 6:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Shawn Tigue
Defendant:
Lisa L. Fugate, Karen Blondell, Don Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gardner v. Sams
as 6:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Damaad Gardner
Defendant:
J. Sams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mitchell v. Comprehensive Correctional Care et al
as 5:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
Comprehensive Correctional Care and Medical Staff McCracken County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
