Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Denton v. Brun
as 3:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Robert Seth Denton
Respondent:
Chris Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tatum v. Rose et al
as 1:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Dustin Seth Tatum
Defendant:
Sharon Rose, Cynthia Casagrande, Steve Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons, Jr. v. The City of Chester County et al
as 1:2023cv01149
Plaintiff:
Jeffie Simmons, Jr.
Defendant:
The City of Chester County, Steve Davidson and Seth Preslar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Dickson County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00624
Plaintiff:
Randall Seth Robinson
Defendant:
Dickson County Jail, Tim Eads, (f/n/u) Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gooch v. Charles et al
as 3:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Tony Gooch
Defendant:
Jennifer Charles, Steve Dozier, Justin Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gehling v. Sliager et al
as 3:2021cv00400
Plaintiff:
Seth Gehling
Defendant:
Billy Sliager, Ricky Oaks and Jefferson County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Viryasiri v. Criminal Courts, Division VI, State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00070
Defendant:
Judge Seth Norman, Judge Mark Fishburn, Criminal Courts, Division VI, State of Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Phaitoon Sean Viryasiri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Thomas et al
as 3:2019cv00467
Plaintiff:
Seth Smith
Defendant:
Sheriff Coffee, Billy Thomas and Glen Ballenger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Gentry et al
as 3:2019cv00859
Defendant:
D. Paul DeWitt, Seth Norman, Kimberly Chandler and others
Plaintiff:
Duan T. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denton v. Carswell
as 2:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert Seth Denton
Defendant:
Lee Carswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
