Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Binkley v. Nationwide Insurance Companies and Affiliates Plan for Your Time and Disability Income Benefits et al
as 2:2011cv00744
Plaintiff:
Brenda Binkley
Defendant:
Nationwide Insurance Companies and Affiliates Plan for Your Time and Disability Income Benefits and Benefits Administrative Committee of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Teresa Webb v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co
as 09-4264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERESA A. WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
English et al v. Gassman et al
as 2:2009cv00871
Plaintiff:
John A English, Benefits Administrative Committee and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Roberta Gassman, Jennifer Ortiz and John Byron Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Tanner v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2009cv00866
Plaintiff:
Sharon Joann Tanner
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Nationwide Services Company and Nationwide Insurance Companies and Affiliates Plan for Your Time and Disability Income Benefits
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Glover v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al
as 1:2008cv01086
Plaintiff:
Brian Glover
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, CBI Holdings Inc. Health & Welfare Plan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Foster et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2008cv00020
Plaintiff:
Frank Foster, Frank Foster, Phillip Wamock and others
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McGoldrick et al v. Bradstreet
as 2:2008cv00001
Plaintiff:
Joanne McGoldrick, Joanne McGoldrick, Joanne McGoldrick and others
Defendant:
Angela Bradstreet
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
