Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Andrew Ramirez v. Bridgestone Retail Operation
as 13-1605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW RAMIREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS LLC
Ramirez v. Bolster & Jeffries Health Care Group, LLC
as 1:2012cv00205
Plaintiff:
Malana Sneed Ramirez
Defendant:
Bolster & Jeffries Health Care Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ramirez v. Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC
as 2:2012cv14480
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ramirez
Defendant:
Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC
Jones v. Michigan Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2012cv14466
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Y Jones
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Human Services, Rita Truss, Michigan Office of Inspector General and others
Aldaba v. Happy Mexican, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02347
Plaintiff:
Lizeth Aldaba
Defendant:
Happy Mexican, LLC and Rafael Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Marquez v. Happy Mexican-Winchester, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02043
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Marquez
Defendant:
Happy Mexican-Winchester, LLC and Rafael Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dumas v. Hurley Medical Center et al
as 2:2010cv12661
Plaintiff:
Lowana Shanell Dumas
Defendant:
Hurley Medical Center, Flint, City of, AFSCME Local 1603 and others
Ramirez v. Welch
as 2:2010cv02104
Plaintiff:
Enrique Ramirez
Defendant:
Jackie Welch
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Cordero-Orozco et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2009cv00101
Plaintiff:
Ramon Cordero-Orozco, Ramon Cordero-Orozco, Demetrio Corrales-Aguilar and others
Defendant:
Corby Brown, Elliott Brown and Larry Brown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jose Rosiles-Perez, et al v. Superior Forestry Service Inc., et al
as 08-6336
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSE ROSILES-PEREZ, JESUS SANTIAGO-SALMORAN, ANDRES ALDANA-MORENO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SUPERIOR FORESTRY SERVICE INC., SCOTT BARSTOW and WILLIAM IOUP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
