Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Mays v. Met Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2010cv00322
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mays
Defendant:
Met Life Insurance Company , General Motors Corporation , Kaylee Jo Ruth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- ERISA
White et al v. Akron Beacon Journal Publishing Company, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv02193
Plaintiff:
David White, Regina White, Hugh Downing and others
Defendant:
Akron Beacon Journal Publishing Company, Inc., David Holmes Black, Edward R Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Pursel v. Cash America International, Inc. aka and/or dba Cash America
as 3:2009cv01786
Plaintiff:
Ruth Pursel
Defendant:
Cash America International, Inc. aka and/or dba Cash America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Swank v. MacArthur et al
as 2:2008cv00843
Plaintiff:
Ruth Swank
Defendant:
Steven MacArthur, MacArthur, Inc., Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ruth Mitzel v. Anthem Life Insurance Co., et al
as 08-4033
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RUTH A. MITZEL
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHEM LIFE INSURANCE CO., WELLPOINT, INC. and WELLPOINT FLEXIBLE BENEFIT PLAN
Harris v. Murtis H. Taylor Multi Services Center
as 1:2007cv02076
Defendant:
Murtis H. Taylor Multi Services Center and Ruth Addison
Plaintiff:
Stewart Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mitzel v. Anthem Life Insurance Co. et al
as 5:2007cv01993
Plaintiff:
Ruth A. Mitzel and Ruth A. Mitzel
Defendant:
Anthem Life Insurance Co. and WellPoint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Gerke v. State Farm Group Long Term Disability Plan for U.S. Employees et al
as 2:2007cv00372
Plaintiff:
Ruth Gerke
Defendant:
State Farm Group Long Term Disability Plan for U.S. Employees and The Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
