Cases 1 - 10 of 20
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC v. Swift & Staley Inc.
as 5:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Swift & Staley Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Wesley McClanahan v. AAA Mid Atlantic et al
as 5:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Misty Lynn Wesley McClanahan
Defendant:
AAA Mid Atlantic, AAA Allied Group and AAA Club Alliance Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Libertas Copper, Inc v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
as 3:2021cv00034
Plaintiff:
Libertas Copper, Inc doing business as Hussey Copper
Counter Claimant:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
Counter Defendant:
Libertas Copper, Inc
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
Greenhouse Holdings, LLC v. International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 91
as 4:2021cv00029
Defendant:
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 91
Plaintiff:
Greenhouse Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Allied Federation, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division of International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00013
Plaintiff:
Allied Federation, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division of International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC and its Local No. 1693 v. LLFlex, LLC
as 3:2018cv00495
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC and its Local No. 1693
Defendant:
LLFlex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC et al v. Dana Holding Corporation
as 4:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC and United Steelworkers Local 9443-02
Defendant:
Dana Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper, and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Jackson Hospital Corporation
as 5:2013cv00240
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper, and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
Defendant:
Jackson Hospital Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Catlettsburg Refining, LLC et al
as 0:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
Defendant:
Catlettsburg Refining, LLC and Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc.
as 0:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
Defendant:
Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
