Cases 101 - 110 of 507
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00912
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tiger Lily LLC et al v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 2:2020cv02692
Defendant:
Alex Azar, United States Department of Health & Human Services, Nina B. Witkovsky and others
Plaintiff:
Churchill Townhomes LLC, North 22nd Flat, LLC, Brittany Railey and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Neighborhood Preservation, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL HOUSING LAW PROJECT and BEACON CENTER OF TENNESSEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elias Pu v. William Barr
as 20-3959
Petitioner:
ELIAS IXCOTOYAC PU
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Brenda Solis-Puentes v. William Barr
as 20-3961
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
BRENDA KARINA SOLIS-PUENTES
Nery Calel-Ixcoy v. William Barr
as 20-3966
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
NERY CALEL-IXCOY
Cristian Ruiz-Esteban v. William Barr
as 20-3967
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN RUBILDO RUIZ-ESTEBAN
Wogan Group LLC et al v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 2:2020cv02691
Defendant:
Alex Azar, United States Department of Health & Human Services, Benjamin S. Carson, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Churchill Townhomes LLC, David and Rebecca Corporation, North 22nd Flat, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jorge Benedict v. William Barr
as 20-3955
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
JORGE ANTONIO FLORES BENEDICT
Carolina Ramos-Lopez, et al v. William Barr
as 20-3956
Petitioner:
CAROLINA FAUSTINA RAMOS-LOPEZ and DANIEL JOSUE RAMOS-LOPEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Carlos Garcia-Deleon v. William Barr
as 20-3957
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
CARLOS ALFONSO GARCIA-DELEON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
