Cases 111 - 120 of 145
Busby, et al v. Bonner, et al
as 2:2020cv02359
Plaintiff:
Michael Edginton, Favian Busby and Michael Edgington
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr. and Shelby County Sheriff's Office
Amicus Curiae:
Amici Curiae of Prison Rights Organizations and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Bonner et al
as 2:2020cv02352
Defendant:
Officer Bowman, Sgt Wilks, Buntings and others
Plaintiff:
Hans Allen Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2020cv02351
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Officer Freeman, Officer Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Corry Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Parker et al
as 2:2020cv02304
Defendant:
Tony Parker, CCS Medical Services, Floyd Bonner and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Davis et al
as 2:2020cv02254
Defendant:
Officer Harrell, Sgt. Echols, Floyd Bonner, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Tenn. Board of Paroles
as 2:2020cv02225
Respondent:
Tenn. Board of Paroles and Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Desmond Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frye v. Bonner et al
as 2:2020cv02162
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr. and The Shelby County Justice Complex
Plaintiff:
Andarius Frye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Bonner et al
as 2:2020cv02152
Defendant:
Kirk Fields, Floyd Bonner, Lt. Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2020cv02140
Respondent:
The State of Tennessee and Floyd Bonner
Petitioner:
Benjamin Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ratliff v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2020cv02012
Plaintiff:
Demerrick Ratliff
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee, Floyd Bonner, Jr. and Lee Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
