Cases 121 - 130 of 158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00133
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Riches v. Federal Medical Center Lexington et al
as 5:2009mc00122
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Lexington, Kentucky Department of Corrections, Blackburn Correctional Complex and others
Washington v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2009cv00107
Petitioner:
Antoine Thomas Washington
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Karen Hogsten
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Stanko v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
Rudy Stanko
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
House v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2009cv00019
Petitioner:
Jonathan L. House
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and FPC-Beckley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. United States of America et al
as 6:2009cv00075
Petitioner:
Anthony F. Brown
Respondent:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Karen Hogsten
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2008cv00618
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Fulner, Hattie Small and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2008cv00382
Petitioner:
Welby Thomas Cox
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Karen Hogsten
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Johnson v. USA et al
as 5:2008cv00478
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Johnson
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Stephen M. Dewalt and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Klopf v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2008cv00469
Plaintiff:
Michael James Klopf
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
