Cases 141 - 150 of 174
Powell v. Clemons et al
as 1:2010cv01242
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Haymon Powell
Defendant:
Chris Clemons, Masson McDowell and Dyersburg City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DePriest v. Clemons et al
as 1:2010cv01240
Plaintiff:
Patrick DePriest
Defendant:
Chris Clemons and Masson McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. McDowell et al
as 1:2010cv01239
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jones
Defendant:
Masson McDowell and Chris Clemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. McDowell et al
as 1:2010cv01187
Plaintiff:
Dontonio Tate
Defendant:
Masson McDowell, Chris Clemons and State Gazzette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv12450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Maze v. McDowell et al
as 1:2010cv01152
Plaintiff:
Paul David Maze
Defendant:
Masson McDowell and Chris Clemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maze v. McDowell et al
as 1:2010cv01121
Plaintiff:
Paul Maze
Defendant:
Masson McDowell and Chris Clemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Clemons v. Comm of Social Security
as 10-5537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH TODD CLEMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Jasper Vick v. Shelby County Sheriff's Depart, et al
as 10-5496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASPER LEE VICK
Defendant:
SHELBY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and MARK LUTTRELL, Shelby County Sheriff
Defendant - Appellee:
TILLMAN, Lt., W. R. CLEMONS, Sgt., C. TUGGLE, Deputy Jailer and others
Adkins et al v. Glaxosmithkline, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02127
Plaintiff:
Terry Adeyemi, Sarah F. Adkins, Barbara J. Ahmad and others
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline, LLC, Glaxosmithkline, LLC, Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare LLC and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
