Cases 11 - 17 of 17
In re: Christopher Simmon
as 15-8029
Debtor:
In re: CHRISTOPHER BERNARD SIMMONS
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Intervenor - Intervenor:
CAIRO BASEM IMHOTEP BEY
Christopher Simmons v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, et al
as 14-6416
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD SIMMONS, Injured Party
Defendant - Appellee:
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP and NATIONWIDE TRUSTEE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1 THROUGH 10, Inclusive
Simmons v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 3:2014cv00761
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Simmons
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP , Nationwide Trustee Services, Inc. and John Doe 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Christopher Simmons v. Federal National Mortgage Ass, et al
as 13-5791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD SIMMONS, Injured Party
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, ET AL., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. ET AL., FANNIE MAE REMIC TRUST 2006-69 and others
Simmons v. Federal National Mortgage Association, et al et al
as 3:2013cv00142
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Simmons
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, et al , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al. , Fannie Mae Remic Trust 2006-69 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Foreclosure
Boyce v. Thompson et al
as 2:2010cv02760
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Boyce
Defendant:
Ryan Edward Thompson , City Of Memphis, Tennessee; and Memphis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyce v. Thompson et al
as 2:2010cv02757
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Boyce
Defendant:
Ryan Edward Thompson, City Of Memphis, Tennessee and Memphis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
