Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Ehrenberg v. UNUM Group, et al.
as 5:2016cv01864
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Ehrenberg
Defendant:
Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chu, DDS v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv14357
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn K Chu, DDS
Defendant:
The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Louis Leonor v. Provident Life & Accident Co, et al
as 14-2152
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
LOUIS LEONOR
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT COMPANY and PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Louis Leonor v. Provident Life & Accident Co, et al
as 14-2120
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LOUIS LEONOR
Defendant - Appellant:
PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT COMPANY and PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Martin Stoneman v. The Paul Revere Life In
as 14-1231
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARTIN STONEMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Martin Stoneman v. The Paul Revere Life Ins. Co.
as 14-1070
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARTIN STONEMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Everhart v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, et al.
as 1:2013cv00789
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Everhart
Defendant:
Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and UNUM Group Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffey v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
as 6:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Sandra Coffey
Defendant:
The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Sandra Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Buck v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
as 2:2012cv15623
Plaintiff:
John T Buck
Defendant:
The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
Stoneman v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
as 2:2012cv15334
Plaintiff:
Martin Stoneman
Defendant:
The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.