Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Horvat et al v. Compco Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01111
Plaintiff:
Stephen Horvat and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
Defendant:
Compco Industries, Inc. and Hospitalization For Retirees and Spouses Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Svc. Emp. Intl. Union, Local 1, et al v. Jon Husted, et al
as 12-4069
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 863, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 880, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS, LOCAL 1059 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JON HUSTED
Amicus Curiae:
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH, CITIZENS REFORM ASSOCIATION OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF OHIO and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF OHIO
Defendant:
TIMOTHY M. BURKE, et al
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Local 1-7001, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Worke
as 1:2012cv01158
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
Defendant:
Local 1-7001, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, PNC Bank, National Association and Parma Service Workers Local 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Autry v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC et al
as 2:2011cv12462
Plaintiff:
James Autry
Defendant:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC , USW Local 1299 , James Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Robert Moore, et al v. Menasha Corporation
as 11-1423
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
ROBERT MOORE, ELEANOR RHODES, GUSTAVE PEPPEL and others
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
MENASHA CORPORATION
Robert Moore, et al v. Menasha Corporation
as 11-1422
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
ROBERT MOORE, ELEANOR RHODES, GUSTAVE PEPPEL and others
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
MENASHA CORPORATION
McCoy et al v. Eljer Plumbingware, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv02529
Plaintiff:
Robert McCoy and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Eljer Plumbingware, Inc. and Group Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
William Clendenning, et al v. NewPage Corporation, et al
as 10-4306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CLENDENNING, DOUGLAS MILTON ALLEN, ROBERT WOODS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NEWPAGE CORPORATION, NEWPAGE CORPORATION WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN and DOES 1 THROUGH 20
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union et al v. U.S. Natural Resources
as 1:2010cv01742
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union and Local 12833 United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
Defendant:
U.S. Natural Resources
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Massie et al v. Polyone Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv01694
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Massie and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Polyone Corporation, The Hanna Mining Company Group Insurance Plan for Hourly Wage Employees of Iron Ore Companies and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
