Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Mash v. Clymer et al
as 5:2017cv00193
Plaintiff:
Billy C. Mash
Defendant:
Craig Z. Clymer, Daniel Boaz, Matthew Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dewalt et al v. Crown Equipment Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Danny Glen Dewalt and Sherry Dewalt
Defendant:
Crown Equipment Corporation , Doe Manufacturer A-Z, Doe Maintenance A-Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Long et al v. Juice Box Vapor Company et al
as 3:2016cv00344
Plaintiff:
Zachary Long and Katie Long
Defendant:
Juice Box Vapor Company, Premium Estore, LLC, Shenzhen Fest Technology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thorton v. City of Louisville, Kentucky et al
as 3:2016cv00197
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Thorton
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Kentucky, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, John Hagen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hone v. Osborne-Owens et al
as 7:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Dawn Hone
Defendant:
Thomas E. Osborne-Owens, Nealson Z. Osborne-Owens, Lonnie Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RWI Transportation, LLC v. Z-Way-Transport, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
RWI Transportation, LLC
Defendant:
Z-Way-Transport, LLC and John Does 1-5, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Gamble v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00317
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Don Bottom, Jack Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
