Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Morgan v. Warden
as 3:2015cv00046
Petitioner:
Buster R. Morgan
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wooton et al v. Powell County et al
as 5:2014cv00397
Plaintiff:
Buster Wooton, Jr. and Wesley Collins
Defendant:
Powell County and Fiscal Court of Powell County, Powell County Sheriff Department, Danny Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Goodwine et al
as 5:2013cv00402
Plaintiff:
Buster Chandler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buster v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
Polly D. Buster
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Perko et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2012ds35000
Plaintiff:
Daniel Perko , Kevin Kinch , Precast Services and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carmody et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20068
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Carmody and Buster Carmody
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buster Chandler, Jr. v. Cookie Crews, et al
as 11-6128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BUSTER CHANDLER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COOKIE CREWS, Warden, WILLIAM PALMER, Director of General Operations Unit C, MELODY SMITH, Dorm 9 Unit Manager and others
Buster et al v. Georgetown Housing Authority et al
as 5:2011cv00185
Plaintiff:
Cheracia Buster and Michele Restainer
Defendant:
Georgetown Housing Authority and Brenda Valentine-Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Buckeye Management Group, LLC et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2011cv00845
Plaintiff:
Buckeye Management Group, LLC , Mark Jennings , Dustin Tyler and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chandler v. Crews et al
as 3:2010cv00780
Plaintiff:
Buster Chandler
Defendant:
Cookie Crews , William Palmer , Melody Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
