Cases 21 - 30 of 122
Coward v. Osborne et al
as 4:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
Darius Coward
Defendant:
David Osborne, Daviess County, Kentucky and Kentucky Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlock v. Osborne
as 4:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Cliff Joshua Carlock
Defendant:
David Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michigan Corrections Organiza, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 14-1028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHIGAN CORRECTIONS ORGANIZATION, (MCO), Service Employees International Union, Local 526M, LORI AUGUSTINE, DENNIS BEECHAM and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DANIEL H. HEYNS, acting in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections
Peters v. Osborn et al
as 4:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
William Allen Peters
Defendant:
David Osborne, Crystal Howard, Chris Isbill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juliot et al v. Osborne
as 4:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
Johnny Juliot, Robert Baucom and Donnie Bullock
Defendant:
David Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Revel Zain v. David Osborne, et al
as 13-6259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REVEL ZAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID OSBORNE, BILL BILLINGS, KANETH ELSHCHIDE and others
Wallace v. Osborne et al
as 4:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
Antawane Marques Wallace
Defendant:
David Osborne and Daviess County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michigan Corrections Organization (MCO), Service Employees International Union, Local 526M et al v. State of Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC)
as 5:2013cv13262
Plaintiff:
Michigan Corrections Organization (MCO), Service Employees International Union, Local 526M , Lori Augustine , Dennis Beecham and others
Defendant:
State of Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC)
Quinn v. City of Owensboro, Kentucky et al
as 4:2013cv00078
Plaintiff:
George Kevin Quinn
Defendant:
City of Owensboro, Kentucky, David Osborne, Southern Health Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
