Cases 21 - 28 of 28
City of Bellbrook v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
City of Bellbrook
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
City of Fairborn v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
City of Fairborn
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Village of Bridgeport v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv02638
Plaintiff:
Village of Bridgeport
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
City of Portsmouth v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
City of Portsmouth
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Walloon Lake Water System, Inc. v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2021cv00797
Plaintiff:
Walloon Lake Water System, Inc.
Defendant:
Tyco Fire Products LP, Chemguard, Inc., The 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aqua Ohio, Inc. v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2021cv00816
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Tyco Fire Products, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Aqua Ohio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Nessel et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2021cv00205
Defendant:
Corteva, Inc., DuPont De Nemours, Inc., DowDupont, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel and State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Nessel et al v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 1:2020cv00787
Defendant:
Hazard Control Technologies, Inc, DowDupont, Inc., Noble Industrial Supply Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
The State of Michigan, Attorney General Dana Nessel, on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan, and the STATE of MICHIGAN, Dana Nessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
