Cases 21 - 30 of 31
CMH Homes, Inc. v. Bob's Homes Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00259
Plaintiff:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Bob's Homes Services, LLC and Robert Southworth
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
CMH Homes, Inc. v. Bob's Homes Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017mc00018
Plaintiff:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Bob's Homes Services, LLC and Robert Southworth
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
CMH Homes, Inc. v. Bob's Homes Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017oe00259
Plaintiff:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Bob's Homes Services, LLC and Robert Southworth
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Cantley et al v. Home Servicing, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv11124
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Cantley and Robin B Cantley
Defendant:
Home Servicing, LLC and Land Home Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ProVia Door, Inc. et al v. proVia Home Services, LLC
as 5:2016cv01132
Plaintiff:
ProVia Door, Inc. and ProVia Products, LLC
Defendant:
proVia Home Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv14331
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharp v. Avon Home Services, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv02041
Plaintiff:
Derek Sharp
Defendant:
Avon Home Services, LLC, Terrence Mitchell and Josh Bullock
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Candrilli et al v. Law Offices of Manbir S. Sandhu LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00695
Plaintiff:
Alfred J. Candrilli and Vada L. Patterson
Defendant:
Law Offices of Manbir S. Sandhu LLC and Home Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Boyer v. Franklin Credit Management Co. et al
as 2:2013cv12328
Plaintiff:
James Boyer
Defendant:
Franklin Credit Management Co. and Home Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
