Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Mondie v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2017cv02544
Plaintiff:
Janice Mondie
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Division of Memphis, Light, Gas and Water and Jerry Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Malone v. Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division
as 2:2017cv02336
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Malone
Defendant:
Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Everett v. Memphis Light Gas and Water Division
as 2:2016cv02810
Plaintiff:
Autumn Everett
Defendant:
Memphis Light Gas and Water Division
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Casey v. Memphis Light, Gas and Water
as 2:2015cv02795
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Casey
Defendant:
Memphis Light, Gas and Water
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Milam v. Southaven Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv02029
Plaintiff:
Tina L. Milam
Defendant:
Southaven Police Department, Todd Samples, Baptist Memorial Hospital Desoto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Memphis v. Church Insurance Company of Vermont et al
as 2:2014cv02770
Defendant:
Church Insurance Company of Vermont , City Of Memphis, Tennessee and Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Samantha Rajapakse v. Baker, Donelson,Bearman, et al
as 13-6054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMANTHA DELANE RAJAPAKSE
Defendant - Appellee:
BAKER, DONELSON,BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, CITY OF MEMPHIS, DAVID LEE BEARMAN, Shareholder and counsel for Memphis Light Gas and Water and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
