Cases 21 - 30 of 696
Cook v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al.
as 3:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
William H. Cook, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Colette Peters, Warden David LeMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Peters v. Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Mel Peters
Defendant:
Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Peters v. Dayton-Phoenix Group, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Valerie Peters
Defendant:
Dayton-Phoenix Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Peters v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Galen Peters
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dirksen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01148
Plaintiff:
Peter Jeremy Dirksen
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bova v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Peter Bova
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Draper v. Gaylo et al.
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Sharmayne Draper
Defendant:
Peter M. Gaylo and Bolus Freight Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
