Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Sealed Matter
as 2:2009mc50124
Respondent:
United States America and United States America
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States America v. Currency $5,995
as 2:2009cv10159
Plaintiff:
United States America
Defendant:
Currency $5,995
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
United States America v. Real Property .5 Acres of Land, Bay City, Michigan et al
as 1:2008cv15144
Plaintiff:
United States America
Defendant:
Real Property .5 Acres of Land, Bay City, Michigan and Granco Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condem
Entrust Great Lakes LLC v. Davis et al
as 2:2008cv14872
Plaintiff:
Entrust Great Lakes, LLC
Defendant:
Cathy I Davis, Percy F Jones, Penelope Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Campbell v. United States America
as 2:2008cv14804
Petitioner:
Cardell Campbell
Respondent:
United States America
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States America v. Currency $159,103 et al
as 2:2008cv14445
Plaintiff:
United States America
Defendant:
Currency $159,103, Currency $73,170, Currency $6,065 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Moshluk v. United States America
as 2:2008cv14301
Plaintiff:
Steven W Moshluk
Defendant:
United States America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Moshluk v. United States America
as 2:2008cv14300
Plaintiff:
Steven W Moshluk
Defendant:
United States America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
United States America v. Currency $35,964 From Chase Bank Account No. XXXXX0719 et al
as 2:2008cv13839
Plaintiff:
United States America
Defendant:
Currency $35,964 from Chase Bank Account XXXXX0719 and Currency $1,503,850 from Chase Bank Account XXXXXX7314
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
