Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Anderson v. Schofield et al
as 1:2013cv01066
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Anderson
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Henry Steward, Brenda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Parker, et al
as 1:2013cv01049
Plaintiff:
David Freeman Clay
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Brenda Jones, Tiffany Garr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milby v. Parker et al
as 1:2011cv01399
Plaintiff:
Raymond M. Milby
Defendant:
Tony Parker, David Mills, Brenda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Strain et al
as 1:2011cv01402
Plaintiff:
Katius Williams
Defendant:
Mike Strain, Miranda Strain, Carrie Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Parker et al
as 1:2011cv01395
Plaintiff:
Christopher Talley
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Brenda Jones, Henry Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv01127
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Roberts and Marshall H. Murdock
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Derrick R. Schofield, Ruben Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22439
Plaintiff:
Brenda Jones
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roscoe Crawley v. Tony Parker, et al
as 11-6208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSCOE T. CRAWLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY PARKER, HAROLD BUTLER, BRENDA JONES and others
Jones v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00936
Plaintiff:
Brenda Jones
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pierce v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2011cv01283
Plaintiff:
Shaun Pierce
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tony Parker, Brenda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
