Cases 31 - 40 of 568
Gongos v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2022cv11907
Plaintiff:
Anne Gongos
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv11194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Council v. Sottile et al
as 1:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Council
Defendant:
Anthony D. Sottile, JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Michael Lubes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fd Removal - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Filing Error
as 1:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Jessie Cox
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Cox v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
Jessie Cox
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Goldsberry et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 2:2022cv01039
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Goldsberry, Myrdith Sherow and Alan Goldsberry
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Kahn et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 2:2022cv10295
Plaintiff:
Mahmood Kahn and Anwar Shah Khattak Revocable Trust Dated January 28, 2020
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kenneth Siebert, et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 22-1051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH SIEBERT and KIMBERLY J. SIEBERT, aka Kimberly J. Shorter-Siebert
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, fka Bank of New York as Successor Trustee to J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
