Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Thomas v. Shelby Co. Jail et al
as 2:2012cv02457
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Thomas
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Jail, A.C. Wharton, Mark H. Luttrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2012cv02403
Plaintiff:
Steven Alan Hughes
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Health Care Services and James E. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caery v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
Frederick L. Caery
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Dept. of Corr., Minus Adams, Karen Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2012cv02313
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, James E. Coleman, Tonya Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Benson v. Mark Luttrell, Jr., et al
as 12-5418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON, aka Rickey Benson
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., JAMES E. COLEMAN and ROBERT MOORE
Benson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2012cv02300
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County Government, Mark H. Luttrell, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20699
Plaintiff:
Margaret E. Coleman
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole v. Shelby Co. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv02117
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cole
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Dept. of Corrections, Correct Care Solutions, Randolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. S.C.D.C. et al
as 2:2011cv03084
Plaintiff:
Dana Walker
Defendant:
S.C.D.C., James E. Coleman, Dennis Tillman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. Shelby Co. Dept. of Corr. et al
as 2:2011cv02817
Plaintiff:
Donny Parson
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Dept. of Corr., Karen Mitchell, Tonya J. Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
