Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Samantha Reed-Rajapakse v. Memphis Light Gas and Water, et al
as 13-6017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMANTHA REED-RAJAPAKSE
Defendant - Appellee:
MEMPHIS LIGHT GAS AND WATER, PRESIDENT JERRY COLLINS, CITY OF MEMPHIS and others
Evans v. UNUM Group Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv02178
Plaintiff:
Peggy Evans
Defendant:
UNUM Group Corporation and Memphis Light Gas and Water
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Evans v. Memphis Light Gas and Water
as 2:2013cv02177
Plaintiff:
Peggy Evans
Defendant:
Memphis Light Gas and Water
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Smith et al v. Memphis Light Gas and Water et al
as 2:2013cv02098
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith and Betty Smith
Defendant:
Memphis Light Gas and Water and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steven Green v. Memphis Light, Gas and Water
as 13-5159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN B. GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MEMPHIS LIGHT, GAS AND WATER, "MLG&W"
Samantha Reed-Rajapakse v. Memphis Light Gas and Water, et al
as 13-5163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMANTHA REED-RAJAPAKSE
Defendant - Appellee:
MEMPHIS LIGHT GAS AND WATER, PRESIDENT JERRY COLLINS, CITY OF MEMPHIS and others
Reed-Rajapakse v. Memphis Light Gas and Water et al
as 2:2012cv02807
Plaintiff:
Samantha Reed-Rajapakse
Defendant:
Memphis Light Gas and Water, Jerry Collins, City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-6484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lindsey v. Memphis Light Gas and Water Division, City of Memphis
as 2:2009cv02448
Miscellaneou:
Dewun R. Settle
Plaintiff:
Deloris Lindsey
Defendant:
Memphis Light Gas and Water Division, City of Memphis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
