Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 73
William Hamby, Jr. v. Punchy et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00200
Defendant: Tony Parker, Aramark Corp., Inmate Kitchen Workers and others
Plaintiff: William D. Hamby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Settle v. Parris et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00032
Defendant: Michael Parris and Anthony Gibson
Plaintiff: Mike Settle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guilfoy v. Parris We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01371
Interested Party: Tennessee Attorney General (Habeas)
Plaintiff: Timothy Guilfoy
Defendant: Michael Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Settle v. Parris We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00521
Petitioner: Mike Settle
Respondent: Michael Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKinney v. Parris We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02790
Petitioner: Herman McKinney
Respondent: Michael Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilkerson v. Parris
as 3:2018mc00043
Petitioner: Adrian D Wilkerson
Respondent: Michael Parris
Bennett et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2018cv00399
Plaintiff: Corey Bennett, Ezra Shelton, Deangelo Montez Moody and others
Defendant: Tony Parker, Michael Parris, Steve Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Parris
as 2:2018cv02049
Petitioner: Jerome L. Johnson
Respondent: Michael Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Parris
as 2:2017cv02846
Petitioner: Marvin Davis
Respondent: Michael Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moody v. Parris et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01187
Petitioner: Gregory L. Moody
Respondent: Michael Parris and Herbert Harrison Slatery, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?