Cases 31 - 40 of 136
Ray, et al v. Memphis Bonding Company, Incorporated, et al
as 2:2018cv02144
Plaintiff:
Glenn Ray and Loris Shepard
Defendant:
Memphis Bonding Company, Incorporated, George A. Hitt and Tracy Van Pittman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Sharp v. Memphis Bonding Company, Incorporated, et al
as 2:2018cv02143
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sharp
Defendant:
Memphis Bonding Company, Incorporated, George A. Hitt and Tracy Van Pittman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Bailey v. Memphis Bonding Company, Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02115
Defendant:
Memphis Bonding Company, Incorporated, George A. Hitt and Tracy Van Pittman
Plaintiff:
Robert Bailey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Jellison v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2017cv01434
Plaintiff:
James Jellison
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon Hinniger, Blair Liebach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2017cv01409
Plaintiff:
Rodney T. Patterson
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon Hinniger, Blair Liebach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newell v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01387
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Newell
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Stacy Carter, Blair Leibach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Washburn et al
as 3:2017cv01292
Plaintiff:
Marvin Green
Defendant:
Rusty Washburn, Yolanda Pittman, Joanna Veil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv01175
Petitioner:
Steven Dwayne Pittman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Walls v. TDOC et al
as 2:2017cv02549
Defendant:
TDOC, West High Compound, Tony Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Maurico Walls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
